<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mrs. G does 72 HOURS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/mrs-g-does-72-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/mrs-g-does-72-hours/</link>
	<description>Author of fun contemporary romances &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Wayne Porter</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/mrs-g-does-72-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Wayne Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/29/mrs-g-does-72-hours/#comment-5105</guid>
		<description>*smirking*

I still think you&#039;re nuts, but... :cheer:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*smirking*</p>
<p>I still think you&#8217;re nuts, but&#8230; :cheer:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meljean</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/mrs-g-does-72-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/29/mrs-g-does-72-hours/#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the book lives or dies on the pageâ€”it either worked for that reader or it didnâ€™t. Following reviews around trying to explain, justify or clarify is not only an exercise in futility, but a little unattractive, as well.&quot;

Words to live by, as much as I think we want to do the opposite.

And I thought it was a great review, despite all of the stuff she mentioned not liking -- if I hadn&#039;t already picked it up, I would have after that. Because as Charlene says, an 88 or 87 from Mrs G is amazingly high -- so even the stuff she said didn&#039;t work for her, she didn&#039;t not like it THAT much :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the book lives or dies on the pageâ€”it either worked for that reader or it didnâ€™t. Following reviews around trying to explain, justify or clarify is not only an exercise in futility, but a little unattractive, as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Words to live by, as much as I think we want to do the opposite.</p>
<p>And I thought it was a great review, despite all of the stuff she mentioned not liking &#8212; if I hadn&#8217;t already picked it up, I would have after that. Because as Charlene says, an 88 or 87 from Mrs G is amazingly high &#8212; so even the stuff she said didn&#8217;t work for her, she didn&#8217;t not like it THAT much <img src='http://shannonstacey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/mrs-g-does-72-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-5103</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2007/04/29/mrs-g-does-72-hours/#comment-5103</guid>
		<description>Hey, those are amazingly high scores from Mrs. G. :clap: She even says it&#039;s a Secret Baby story that makes sense, and it does. You have a way with secret babies! Now, how&#039;s Gallagher coming along? :whip:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, those are amazingly high scores from Mrs. G. :clap: She even says it&#8217;s a Secret Baby story that makes sense, and it does. You have a way with secret babies! Now, how&#8217;s Gallagher coming along? :whip:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

