<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shannon vs. Word grammar check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/</link>
	<description>Author of fun contemporary romances &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Kent</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3052</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3052</guid>
		<description>Oh, and don&#039;t even try to use Word&#039;s built-in thesaurus if you&#039;re writing anything the least bit suggestive.  They&#039;ve edited out any words that might be questionable.  It&#039;s pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t even try to use Word&#8217;s built-in thesaurus if you&#8217;re writing anything the least bit suggestive.  They&#8217;ve edited out any words that might be questionable.  It&#8217;s pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3051</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3051</guid>
		<description>When I first got Word I had changed the paperclip into a cat, but I found myself talking to it and asking it questions as I wrote, so I killed it altogether. I question my sanity enough without turning the Help cat into my co-author.

:crazy:

Ooh, certain would probably work.  I would have cut it totally, but it&#039;s meant to show...more certainty.  :rofl:  That&#039;ll work.

And a resounding yes on the outsourcing.  You can fake English with a dictionary, but not grammar. (Although Microsoft might be outsourcing that job to our school district :rant:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first got Word I had changed the paperclip into a cat, but I found myself talking to it and asking it questions as I wrote, so I killed it altogether. I question my sanity enough without turning the Help cat into my co-author.</p>
<p>:crazy:</p>
<p>Ooh, certain would probably work.  I would have cut it totally, but it&#8217;s meant to show&#8230;more certainty.  :rofl:  That&#8217;ll work.</p>
<p>And a resounding yes on the outsourcing.  You can fake English with a dictionary, but not grammar. (Although Microsoft might be outsourcing that job to our school district :rant:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Templeton</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3050</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Templeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3050</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes.  The paperclip.  Showed up on hubby&#039;s Word program, but not on mine, so I told him to ignore it.  Then it showed up on mine, so naturally IT HAD TO DIE.  I actually typed in &quot;get rid of paperclip&quot; into the little box up in the right hand corner, and it told me how (place cursor over the evil thing, hit right mouse button, then delete, I think -- or whatever works, it&#039;s early and I don&#039;t rightly remember).

It wouldn&#039;t be so bad if it weren&#039;t for those googly eyes. :eyebrow:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes.  The paperclip.  Showed up on hubby&#8217;s Word program, but not on mine, so I told him to ignore it.  Then it showed up on mine, so naturally IT HAD TO DIE.  I actually typed in &#8220;get rid of paperclip&#8221; into the little box up in the right hand corner, and it told me how (place cursor over the evil thing, hit right mouse button, then delete, I think &#8212; or whatever works, it&#8217;s early and I don&#8217;t rightly remember).</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be so bad if it weren&#8217;t for those googly eyes. :eyebrow:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3049</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3049</guid>
		<description>Just what I needed with my morning coffee. :coffee: Now I have to go read Help Desk. (comic that spoofs Microsoft, with special attention to that helpful paperclip...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I needed with my morning coffee. :coffee: Now I have to go read Help Desk. (comic that spoofs Microsoft, with special attention to that helpful paperclip&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nataliedamschroder</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3048</link>
		<dc:creator>nataliedamschroder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3048</guid>
		<description>Also, would &quot;certain&quot; work in place of &quot;sure&quot;?

I turned off the grammar check, too.  Subject-verb agreement is not a strong suit of Microsoft Grammar Check.

Raise your hands if you think they outsource that job to non-English speakers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, would &#8220;certain&#8221; work in place of &#8220;sure&#8221;?</p>
<p>I turned off the grammar check, too.  Subject-verb agreement is not a strong suit of Microsoft Grammar Check.</p>
<p>Raise your hands if you think they outsource that job to non-English speakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngieW</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3047</link>
		<dc:creator>AngieW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3047</guid>
		<description>*cough* you could delete that from the first sentence and it wouldn&#039;t be so awkward. Just saying :rofl:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*cough* you could delete that from the first sentence and it wouldn&#8217;t be so awkward. Just saying :rofl:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Lucia</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/comment-page-1/#comment-3046</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2006/01/26/shannon-vs-word-grammar-check/#comment-3046</guid>
		<description>I swear, the grammar check is EVIL.  It makes you doubt your own name...

Anna

Or An-na.  Maybe A.Nna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear, the grammar check is EVIL.  It makes you doubt your own name&#8230;</p>
<p>Anna</p>
<p>Or An-na.  Maybe A.Nna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

