<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aggravations abound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/</link>
	<description>Author of fun contemporary romances &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the way there &#187; Conservatives Hate Hard Cocks, Prefer Throbbing Manhoods of Joy</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>the way there &#187; Conservatives Hate Hard Cocks, Prefer Throbbing Manhoods of Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-954</guid>
		<description>[...] pril 27, 2005 @ 11:10 am  			&#183; Filed under UNPOLITIC						 			 			 				Sylvia Day and Shannon Stacey take on the conservative mood in the romance community.  Apparen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pril 27, 2005 @ 11:10 am  			&#183; Filed under UNPOLITIC						 			 			 				Sylvia Day and Shannon Stacey take on the conservative mood in the romance community.  Apparen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 04:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Ultimately, that&#039;s the only thing that really sends a message.  :nod:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately, that&#8217;s the only thing that really sends a message.  :nod:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Grr...:cursin: It truly makes me want to take up pen in hand and fire off a letter.:write: The sad thing is I used to enjoy your books. (Note: I did not say her covers.) But because of this letter I won&#039;t be buying anything else from her. I decided to let my pocketbook talk for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grr&#8230;:cursin: It truly makes me want to take up pen in hand and fire off a letter.:write: The sad thing is I used to enjoy your books. (Note: I did not say her covers.) But because of this letter I won&#8217;t be buying anything else from her. I decided to let my pocketbook talk for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what I personally resent: her six year old book (breast feeding babe) is doing better than my six month old book. Harumph.  :roll:

it&#039;s okay Shannon. :cheer::cheer: at least you&#039;ll have five readers -- angie and her onboard crew and me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I personally resent: her six year old book (breast feeding babe) is doing better than my six month old book. Harumph.  <img src='http://shannonstacey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>it&#8217;s okay Shannon. :cheer::cheer: at least you&#8217;ll have five readers &#8212; angie and her onboard crew and me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-950</guid>
		<description>:lmao:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:lmao:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngieW</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>AngieW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>Yes we are!  :neener: And my other personalities appreciate you including them as well :crazy:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we are!  :neener: And my other personalities appreciate you including them as well :crazy:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-948</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t really about labels for me.  (This entry, anyway.)

What this is about is people who have to rain on other people&#039;s parades.  I don&#039;t care for inspirational romance.  Do I condemn the writers and publishers--and therefore readers--of inspirational romance?  Do I send letters to the RWR editor bespeaking my outrage that they featured an ad for a book espousing spiritual beliefs different from my own?  Do I start flame wars because I won&#039;t tolerate an inspirational writer in my midst?

(I&#039;ll remind y&#039;all that the RTB buckus was about RITA judging, not erotic v. inspy :oops:)

The only difference between her book and mine is her hero has a throbbing manhood, and mine has a :censor:.  (Well, and the setting, and the fact that mine doesn&#039;t feature an Indian breastfeeding a blonde on the cover---or hopefully won&#039;t, anyway---but you know what I mean.  And yet she publicly condemns my publisher, and therefore me, and more importantly, my readers.  (My future readers, I should say.  And boy, all four of them are pretty vocal when they&#039;re unhappy.  :neener:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t really about labels for me.  (This entry, anyway.)</p>
<p>What this is about is people who have to rain on other people&#8217;s parades.  I don&#8217;t care for inspirational romance.  Do I condemn the writers and publishers&#8211;and therefore readers&#8211;of inspirational romance?  Do I send letters to the RWR editor bespeaking my outrage that they featured an ad for a book espousing spiritual beliefs different from my own?  Do I start flame wars because I won&#8217;t tolerate an inspirational writer in my midst?</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ll remind y&#8217;all that the RTB buckus was about RITA judging, not erotic v. inspy <img src='http://shannonstacey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>The only difference between her book and mine is her hero has a throbbing manhood, and mine has a :censor:.  (Well, and the setting, and the fact that mine doesn&#8217;t feature an Indian breastfeeding a blonde on the cover&#8212;or hopefully won&#8217;t, anyway&#8212;but you know what I mean.  And yet she publicly condemns my publisher, and therefore me, and more importantly, my readers.  (My future readers, I should say.  And boy, all four of them are pretty vocal when they&#8217;re unhappy.  :neener:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate PS</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>kate PS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-947</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&#039;d be crying a lot less, Mr. A.  . .She looks like a biter . .&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8217;d be crying a lot less, Mr. A.  . .She looks like a biter . .&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate PS</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>kate PS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does anyone else think &quot;maybe it&#039;s time to wean that woman, Mr. Apache. Twenty-year-olds should NOT still be breastfeeding.&quot;  about that Apache Tears cover?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does anyone else think &#8220;maybe it&#8217;s time to wean that woman, Mr. Apache. Twenty-year-olds should NOT still be breastfeeding.&#8221;  about that Apache Tears cover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/aggravations-abound/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/04/27/aggravations-abound/#comment-945</guid>
		<description>semantics, semantics . . .I&#039;m thinking Sam is right. It&#039;s all what you call it. romance writers are scared to be mixed up with erotica writers who are scared that they&#039;ll be mistaken for porn writers. Labels, schmabels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>semantics, semantics . . .I&#8217;m thinking Sam is right. It&#8217;s all what you call it. romance writers are scared to be mixed up with erotica writers who are scared that they&#8217;ll be mistaken for porn writers. Labels, schmabels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

