<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red-Headed Stepchild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/</link>
	<description>Author of fun contemporary romances &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the way there &#187; Black Rita Finalist (Inspirational again)</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>the way there &#187; Black Rita Finalist (Inspirational again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>[...] he major categories with actual hope in their hearts.  	Shannon Stacey has a rant on the Ritas.  Apparently a lot of the author-judges don&amp;#821 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he major categories with actual hope in their hearts.  	Shannon Stacey has a rant on the Ritas.  Apparently a lot of the author-judges don&amp;#821 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the (controversial) way there &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Black Rita Finalist (Inspirational again)</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>the (controversial) way there &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Black Rita Finalist (Inspirational again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>[...] he major categories with actual hope in their hearts.  	Shannon Stacey has a rant on the Ritas.  Apparently a lot of the author-judges don&amp;#821 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he major categories with actual hope in their hearts.  	Shannon Stacey has a rant on the Ritas.  Apparently a lot of the author-judges don&amp;#821 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the (controversial) way there &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Black Rita Finalist (Inspirational again)</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>the (controversial) way there &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Black Rita Finalist (Inspirational again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>[...] he major categories with actual hope in their hearts.  	Shannon Stacey has a rant on the Ritas.  Apparently a lot of the author-judges don&amp;#821 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he major categories with actual hope in their hearts.  	Shannon Stacey has a rant on the Ritas.  Apparently a lot of the author-judges don&amp;#821 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>I think, even if not on a conscious level, Blaze could suffer a little backlash related to people&#039;s strong opinions about EC.  I was really, really surprised not to see any this year.  Unpleasantly surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, even if not on a conscious level, Blaze could suffer a little backlash related to people&#8217;s strong opinions about EC.  I was really, really surprised not to see any this year.  Unpleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost afraid to comment on this year&#039;s RITA, not wanting anyone to ignore my feelings as sour grapes for not finalling.

I do know one person who read my long contemporary because she was kind enough to let me know she&#039;d judged it and scored it a 9. However, as much as I appreciated that, I have to add the caveat that she had bought the book and read it when it first came out.

Is mixing up the panel of books a good thing? Personally I really enjoyed the box I got. Two of the books I would never ever have bought but I kept an open mind and ended up not only enjoying them but scoring them high.

I wish I could be certain other judges had done the same. Sour grapes warning: I really put my heart into the two books I entered and was deeply disapointed for a full 24 hours at not finalling.  :cursin:  But then I looked again at the list and realized every single one of the LC finalist books seem to be traditional tearjerkers with no sex in sight.

Are those books _really_ better? Or are they just safer? If my reviews, fan mail and editor reaction are credible, then I know that my stories addressed tough issues and had tear-worthy moments and have a place on some keeper shelves. But they also had several highly sensual love scenes and I honest think some judges didn&#039;t give any of the Blazes a chance because of that.

Mia Zachary
http://www.miazachary.com
Sensual Romance with a Touch of Sass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost afraid to comment on this year&#8217;s RITA, not wanting anyone to ignore my feelings as sour grapes for not finalling.</p>
<p>I do know one person who read my long contemporary because she was kind enough to let me know she&#8217;d judged it and scored it a 9. However, as much as I appreciated that, I have to add the caveat that she had bought the book and read it when it first came out.</p>
<p>Is mixing up the panel of books a good thing? Personally I really enjoyed the box I got. Two of the books I would never ever have bought but I kept an open mind and ended up not only enjoying them but scoring them high.</p>
<p>I wish I could be certain other judges had done the same. Sour grapes warning: I really put my heart into the two books I entered and was deeply disapointed for a full 24 hours at not finalling.  :cursin:  But then I looked again at the list and realized every single one of the LC finalist books seem to be traditional tearjerkers with no sex in sight.</p>
<p>Are those books _really_ better? Or are they just safer? If my reviews, fan mail and editor reaction are credible, then I know that my stories addressed tough issues and had tear-worthy moments and have a place on some keeper shelves. But they also had several highly sensual love scenes and I honest think some judges didn&#8217;t give any of the Blazes a chance because of that.</p>
<p>Mia Zachary<br />
<a href="http://www.miazachary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.miazachary.com</a><br />
Sensual Romance with a Touch of Sass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Especially since Shelley writes for Harlequin Blaze as well as her inspiration publisher!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially since Shelley writes for Harlequin Blaze as well as her inspiration publisher!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm. . . I do hope Shelley doesn&#039;t mind my quoting her -- but it&#039;s such a good point. I wonder why the whole length vs. content thing hadn&#039;t come up before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm. . . I do hope Shelley doesn&#8217;t mind my quoting her &#8212; but it&#8217;s such a good point. I wonder why the whole length vs. content thing hadn&#8217;t come up before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>I thought this email exchange on cata was right on target.

&gt;&gt;There&#039;s a category for inspirational romance, so why shouldn&#039;t there
be one for erotic romance?

I have to agree with this, especially since I&#039;m a RITA finalist in the
inspirational category! It doesn&#039;t make sense to me that the
categories are based on length in some cases and content in others. It
should be one standard across the board.

Guess it&#039;s time to let the RWA Board know what we think--they&#039;re
certainly very interested in our input.

Shelley
--
http://www.shelleybates.com
GROUNDS TO BELIEVE, 2005 RITA Award finalist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this email exchange on cata was right on target.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;There&#8217;s a category for inspirational romance, so why shouldn&#8217;t there<br />
be one for erotic romance?</p>
<p>I have to agree with this, especially since I&#8217;m a RITA finalist in the<br />
inspirational category! It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me that the<br />
categories are based on length in some cases and content in others. It<br />
should be one standard across the board.</p>
<p>Guess it&#8217;s time to let the RWA Board know what we think&#8211;they&#8217;re<br />
certainly very interested in our input.</p>
<p>Shelley<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.shelleybates.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.shelleybates.com</a><br />
GROUNDS TO BELIEVE, 2005 RITA Award finalist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cece</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Cece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Larissa I came up with the same explantion Gina did on the numbers and no Alison, you didn&#039;t sound arogant :cheesy:

I think if I didn&#039;t like my local chapter so much (and if I didn&#039;t get so much out of the one online chapter I&quot;m in) I&#039;d seriously debate renewing this fall also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larissa I came up with the same explantion Gina did on the numbers and no Alison, you didn&#8217;t sound arogant :cheesy:</p>
<p>I think if I didn&#8217;t like my local chapter so much (and if I didn&#8217;t get so much out of the one online chapter I&#8221;m in) I&#8217;d seriously debate renewing this fall also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/red-headed-stepchild/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonstacey.com/2005/03/25/red-headed-stepchild/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with everyone else - an Erotica cagetory is definitely needed. I don&#039;t write it myself, but have friends who do and think their work should have its own category for Rita and the GH.

:coffee: Just HAD to use this cute emoticon (and take a sip of coffeee *g*)

Can&#039;t remember if we ever learn how many entries were in each category. Would be nice to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with everyone else &#8211; an Erotica cagetory is definitely needed. I don&#8217;t write it myself, but have friends who do and think their work should have its own category for Rita and the GH.</p>
<p>:coffee: Just HAD to use this cute emoticon (and take a sip of coffeee *g*)</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t remember if we ever learn how many entries were in each category. Would be nice to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

